Listen to the article
Yet another so-called Independence Day in Lebanon, whose celebration stirs a sense of shame. Even the usually modest military parade was cancelled this year due to the absence of a president of the Republic and a lack of integrity (among the ruling class). Instead of raising the national flag high up, political bickering over the presidential election persists, led by a group that abides by the principle of “either me or nobody else.”
For me, Independence Day is closely linked to the Lebanese Army. In our youth, we adorned military attire and proudly raised a paper flag. As adults, we perceive the Army as a bulwark that rescues us from politicians who have led the country into its bleakest fate.
At present, the Army is dealing with political storms. Its commander has been tirelessly shielding it from them since day one of his mandate. This includes thwarting political intervention in the military’s structuring and the filling of military positions.
Since taking over as commander, Gen. Joseph Aoun has consistently protected the institution from political interference. He opposed attempts by politicians to manipulate military formations for electoral purposes.
Joseph Aoun’s tenure displayed a remarkable level of integrity; a period marked by an unwavering determination to resist financial corruption and political maneuverings. His uniform remained untainted by the contamination of certain politicians, especially those in his inner circle, who sought to stifle him with their demands, control, and conditions.
During the October 17 “Thawra,” or revolution, there were attempts to portray him as being against the people. However, he chose to stand by the soldiers, whose eyes were filled with tears as they witnessed the revolution of hungry citizens deeply concerned about the fate of their country.
Despite their attempts to transform him into a tool, he opted to assume the role of a decision-maker. He stood firm, refusing to compromise, showing no leniency, and rejecting encroachments on his authority by defense ministers.
As Joseph Aoun embodies a distinct image from theirs, some politicians are currently engaged in a battle against him.
If he were merely a tool, they would have extended his tenure year after year, showing little concern for laws or prerogatives, similar to their current disregard for the rights of Christians when insisting on the appointment of an army commander in the absence of the president.
All they prioritize are their personal interests, contrasting sharply with Joseph Aoun’s unwavering dedication to the Army. Their sole aim is to prevent him from becoming president, because if Joseph Aoun were to ascend, he might build a country and uphold the law, which would contradict their agenda.
Looking ahead, do we dare to dream of true independence? Yes, we will dream of it, no matter what.
We shall continue to confront those who tarnish Lebanon’s image and assail its Army. We shall remain steadfast beside the truth, even after suffering repeated defeats.
As Gibran Khalil Gibran says it, “the truth needs two men: one to express it and one to comprehend it.”
