Listen to the article
Anatomy of a Fall, the latest masterpiece by Justine Triet, winner of the Palme d’Or in 2023, delves into the yawning gap between our quest for truth and the elusive reality that surrounds us. The film addresses this notion by illuminating multiple perspectives, ranging from individual subjectivity to more structured domains such as psychoanalysis, the judicial system, literature and cinema.
Anatomy of a Fall opens with the harrowing scene of the discovery of a man, Samuel, dead under mysterious circumstances. The film then follows the ensuing trial, accusing his wife, Sandra, of his death. Their son, Daniel, finds himself torn between loyalty to his mother and his desire to uncover the truth behind his father’s demise.
The protagonists of the trial, brilliantly portrayed by Antoine Reinartz and Swann Arlaud, are caught in an incessant struggle between the world of imagination and the pressing need for concrete facts. Each participant in this legal process projects their own subjectivity onto the fabric of reality, thereby demonstrating the system’s inability to grasp a universal truth. Lawyers, through their arguments and cross-examinations, show just how malleable this “truth” can be, tailored to serve specific agendas.
The film also highlights the irony of human experience, as our relationship with reality is constantly filtered through our imaginations. Moreover, it offers a subtle critique of the world of psychoanalysis. The deceased’s therapist becomes involved, further blurring the line between interpretation and reality. The woman at the center of the drama, herself a renowned writer, questions the validity of identifying psychoanalysis as a pathway to truth.
While the couple in question is explored through emotionally charged conflict scenes, the film refrains from taking sides. Indeed, truth is polyphonic, shaped by individual and collective suffering. Samuel and Sandra embody a fragile balance, and both appear equally responsible for the tension that ultimately explodes into tragedy. Both are haunted by an accident that left their son visually impaired, adding another layer of guilt and regret to the drama.
Amidst this fog of fragmented realities, the most moving character may well be Daniel, their child. Confronted with the collapse of his parents’ world, he is catapulted into a role no child should have to play: that of judge and interpreter of adult tragedy. In a poignant gesture, it is his act of love that takes center stage at the end of the film, suggesting that perhaps, beyond our futile quest for truth, love remains the only constant upon which we can rely.
Anatomy of a Fall does not attempt to provide answers, it rather raises questions—questions that resonate in the minds of viewers long after the film has ended. At the heart of this odyssey lies our own flawed but capable humanity, capable of great acts of love and compassion.
Anatomy of a Fall is a rich and complex cinematic experience that challenges the conventions of the legal genre to delve into deeper and more universal questions. Beyond the suspense of the case, the film explores the dark recesses of the human psyche and the fragility of our conceptions of truth. It offers no easy answers but leaves the viewer with lingering questions that resonate long after the theater lights come back on.
