Amid the ongoing war between Hezbollah and Israel, and to ensure Lebanon's internal security without any unnecessary debate, one undeniable truth stands out: renewing Army Commander General Joseph Aoun’s term is a national necessity that should not be contested. Failing to do so risks creating a leadership vacuum in the army and security institutions, which would be difficult to fill temporarily.
Serious discussions are underway regarding the renewal of General Aoun’s term for a second consecutive year. The options currently being considered involve introducing comprehensive laws that would grant an additional two-year extension for officers by raising the retirement age. This extension would also apply to General Imad Othman, Director General of the Internal Security Forces (ISF), and General Elias Baissari, acting Director of General Security.
However, with a persisting presidential vacuum, the extension issue remains uncertain. Political parties are divided, with some, such as the Strong Republic bloc, advocating for an extension of the army commander’s term alone, while others, including the Democratic Gathering and the National Moderation bloc, push for a broader extension that would cover all security chiefs.
Meanwhile, the main obstacle is Hezbollah's unclear position, while the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) maitains its steadfast opposition to the extension. At the same time, other parties emphasize its necessity, viewing it as an unavoidable step to safeguard the country’s security and stability.
Will the army commander’s term be extended again?
Lebanese Forces (LF) MP Melhem Riachi argues that "extending the term of the Lebanese Army commander is crucial given the ongoing war in the south and the presidential vacuum, as appointing a new commander is impossible in the absence of a president."
He concluded by saying, "Security in Lebanon is non-negotiable, and the extension will occur, despite opposition from some factions."
Comments