- 15:00
Shrekking, the latest dating buzzword born on TikTok, blends pop culture with heartbreak. Behind its playful name lies a stark reality of how Gen Z navigates love, risk and disappointment in the age of apps.
What happens when fairytales meet the brutal realities of modern dating? Welcome to the world of shrekking, the latest Gen Z dating term making waves on TikTok and Instagram.
On the surface, it sounds fanciful, even harmless. After all, who doesn’t love Shrek, the green ogre with a heart of gold? But in dating slang, shrekking has little to do with romance and everything to do with disappointment.
From Fairytale to Fiasco
Shrekking means dating someone you’re not attracted to because you believe they’ll treat you better than someone who fits conventional beauty standards. The logic follows Princess Fiona’s gamble: give the ogre a chance, and you may find your happily-ever-after.
But when things go wrong — and they often do — you don’t get a fairytale ending. Instead, you get shrekked: hurt or betrayed by the very person you thought would be “safe.”
As relationship experts explain, the behavior isn’t new. Many people have tried to prioritize kindness or stability over attraction. What’s different is the cynical twist: the assumption that “dating down” guarantees better treatment, a notion that reality often proves false.
Beyond the Swamp
Ultimately, shrekking is a meme, but it warns about the risks of playing it safe in love. Looks aren’t everything, but nor are they a safeguard against heartbreak. Character, communication and compatibility still matter more than any Internet trend.
And perhaps that’s the real lesson hiding in this swamp of modern romance: the best relationships won’t come from lowering expectations, but from raising the bar on honesty and connection.
A Growing Dictionary of Heartbreak
Shrekking is only the latest addition to an expanding vocabulary that seeks to capture the pitfalls of contemporary romance. In recent years, social media has given rise to a proliferation of terms, each crystallizing a pattern of behavior once left unnamed but now instantly recognizable.
Banksying, inspired by the street artist’s elusive style, describes the gradual retreat from a relationship without ever stating it openly. By the time the breakup is made official, the person initiating it has already disengaged, leaving the other partner disoriented and unprepared.
Another striking metaphor is monkey barring: remaining in one relationship while simultaneously seeking another, only releasing the first once the second is firmly secured. The image, borrowed from the way a monkey swings from branch to branch, underlines the calculated avoidance of solitude.
Other expressions highlight forms of concealment or manipulation. Pocketing refers to keeping a partner hidden from one’s social and family circle, relegating them to a shadow existence. Cookie jarring points to a strategy of stockpiling: maintaining several potential partners as “reserves” in case the primary relationship collapses. Perhaps the most corrosive is ghostlighting, a hybrid of ghosting and gaslighting, in which a partner disappears without explanation, only to resurface later denying the withdrawal or placing the blame on the other.
The Language of Digital Love
These labels may sound playful, but they highlight a deeper truth: the anxieties and fractures of digital-age intimacy. Dating, mediated by apps and networks, has become so complex, and often so disappointing, that Gen Z needs a whole new language to talk about it. By naming the hurt, Gen Z makes it easier to recognize, discuss and, maybe, reassess.
Comments